tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3423725371920868922.post2612095202702430945..comments2024-03-27T13:28:18.163-04:00Comments on Balter's Blog: Afghanistan: Still on the back pagesMichael Balterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08311614050647338141noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3423725371920868922.post-48334075181103439632008-08-26T08:35:00.000-04:002008-08-26T08:35:00.000-04:00Thanks, Michael, for this post. "NATO", as so many...Thanks, Michael, for this post. "NATO", as so many other Afghan invaders have been, is in the "proverbial".<BR/><BR/>This was an instant, stupid reaction to 9/11 (or was trumped up to be, together with a great deal of other nasty stuff).<BR/><BR/>Seven years later, nobody's caught the over-publicised outlaw (OBL) and nobody's had the guts to challenge the other outlaws (GWB and wotsisname Cheney).<BR/><BR/>Afghanistan is going to go very bad indeed for "NATO" very soon.<BR/><BR/>And what is the North Atlantic treaty organisation doing there anyway?Richard Parkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11726482358889849398noreply@blogger.com