Peter Rathjen is a well known biochemist and molecular biologist, and, most recently, was a Vice-Chancellor and president of the University of Adelaide in Australia. Earlier this month, however, he was forced to step down when he became the subject of a misconduct investigation by South Australia's Independent Commissioner Against Corruption (ICAC.)
ICAC investigations are normally top secret, with serious penalties for journalists or individuals who divulge confidential information. Although the inquiry has been widely reported in the Australian press, as far as I know only The Australian has provided a reason for it: That Rathjen had engaged in "a personal relationship with a staff member." (Depending on where you access this article, it may be behind a paywall.)
(Just 24 hours earlier, the university's Chancellor, Kevin Scarce, resigned his position. While the reasons are still unclear, there are no allegations of misconduct being reported as of yet.)
Although I have talked to sources at the university, I cannot claim to know more than that at the moment, as information concerning the matter has been closely guarded. I do, however, know something about Rathjen's long history of alleged misconduct, which includes chronic and widely known sexual harassment at the University of Adelaide during his earlier tenure there as a professor and department chair; a misconduct case at a major Australian university which found him guilty of sexual assault against a student; and, while Vice-Chancellor at the University of Tasmania, his alleged protection of the notorious pedophile Nicolaas Bester, who re-offended while a PhD student at UTAS.
Rathjen first came on my radar last year when I was reporting on the case of Alan Cooper, formerly chief of Adelaide's ancient DNA center, who has since been fired for misconduct. A number of women who had been at the university during Rathjen's earlier tenure there (1990-2006) approached me, concerned that Rathjen would be making the final decision about Cooper's fate. At that time, I was told by multiple sources, Rathjen had developed a well known reputation as a sexual harasser. The sources included individuals who had directly experienced this behavior.
The Alan Cooper case revealed that misconduct, including bullying and sexual harassment, had been tolerated at the University of Adelaide for many years. Thus, while complaints against Cooper were made to the university administration beginning in 2006, the first full year that he was in charge of the Australian Centre for Ancient DNA (ACAD), administrators ignored them until last year, when survivors of the abuse finally began to go public. Media coverage in the Australian press, along with major scientific journals such as Science and Nature, made it impossible for Adelaide officials to continue covering up for Cooper, despite the major prestige that ACAD had brought to the university.
(Cooper is currently appealing his firing, and a hearing on the matter is expected around July. University staff have been interviewing and re-interviewing many of the original complainants to get their case ready.)
Bullying and nepotism in the School of Education, abuse of staff at the Adelaide Dental School.
Soon after I began reporting on Alan Cooper, sources within the university began to approach me with allegations of misconduct in other schools and departments. The first such case concerned the head of the School of Education, Faye McCallum. Again, multiple sources testified to an atmosphere of bullying and harassment in the school; in August 2018, the National Tertiary Education Union NTEU), which represents employees in Australian higher education, was forced to write to Jennie Shaw, executive dean in the faculty of arts, because no action against the numerous complaints of bullying, overwork, abuse, and questionable staff appointments had been taken despite numerous complaints. Unfortunately, on May 15, Shaw announced that McCallum had been given a two-year extension of her appointment as head of the School of Education. That fight goes on.
Meanwhile, very similar complaints have arisen in the world-class Adelaide Dental School, which over the last few years has seen its autonomy eroded by the edicts of university administrators. Earlier this year, NTEU conducted a confidential survey which included questions about health and safety, bullying, and confidence in senior school and faculty management. About 80% of staff gave negative responses, according to an April 6, 2020 letter from Cheryl Baldwin--division industrial organizer for the NTEU's South Australia division--to Benjamin Kile, executive dean of Adelaide's Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences. I have considerable documentation of the alleged abuses and will be reporting on them in more detail soon.
Peter Rathjen: Sexual assault, protecting a pedophile, ---?
As I mentioned above, during Rathjen's tenure at a major Australian university, he was found guilty of sexual assault against a student. As this is a very sensitive matter, kept strictly secret, I am not identifying the university in question to protect sources. I hope to be able to say more soon, but there is no doubt about the truth of the matter. Australian academic culture, like the academic culture of most countries, is rife with retaliation and threats of retaliation. The level of fear about speaking out is quite high, especially as Australian science is still largely ruled by an old boys' club in which women (and many men) are the subject of constant intimidation.
This brings us to the case of Nicolaas Bester, one of Australia's most notorious pedophiles. Bester was convicted of grooming and sexually assaulted a 15 year old girl, Grace Tame, while a teacher at St. Michael's Collegiate School in Hobart, Tasmania. In 2011, Bester was sentenced to two years and ten months in jail for his crimes. But due to archaic Tasmanian laws (also enforced in Australia's Northern Territory) that purport to protect victims but actually mask the identity of abusers, Tame had to wait nine years before she could speak out about what happened to her. With the help of journalist and anti-sexual assault advocate Nina Funnell, Tame scored a historic win in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, winning the right to identify herself and name her abuser.
(Funnell wrote a number of articles about the Bester case, including one in which Bester claimed to have been the real victim.)
Bester later entered a graduate program in chemistry at the University of Tasmania (UTAS.). And in 2016, while a PhD student there, Bester was sentenced again to four months in jail for remarks he made on social media about his abuse of Grace Tame, including calling his abuse of her "awesome" and "enviable." A judge ruled that this behavior amounted to the production of child exploitation material online, which seems a reasonable decision at the very least.
Enter Peter Rathjen again. After Bester served his new jail sentence, he returned to the University of Tasmania campus, where Rathjen was Vice-Chancellor, to continue his PhD work, unimpeded by any action from the university administration. That failure to protect students led, in spring of 2017, to a petition campaign calling upon the university to ban him. The campaign was led by the UTAS Women's Collective, and ultimately gathered more than 1600 signatures. "Myself and many others are incredibly disappointed with the University of Tasmania for not removing Nicolaas Bester from campus," said Heidi La Paglia, a member of the collective who started the petition.
The university refused to take any action. According to my sources, Rathjen was instrumental in the decision to allow Bester to finish his graduate work. But both he and Bester had their supporters. Chief among them was the well known Australian barrister Greg Barns, an advocate for prison reform and staunch defender of Julian Assange. In a Twitter exchange with me after he saw my social media posts on Rathjen and the Bester case--in which he accused me of engaging in a "sleazy trial by media campaign"--Barns praised the former UTAS Vice-Chancellor, saying that "Rathjen behaved impeccably and in accordance with the rule of law and fairness."
To sum up simply: It appears that Peter Rathjen has been involved in sexual misconduct, both as an abuser and an enabler, for most of his career. There may be some irony in the fact that his career will probably end in Adelaide, where his reputation as a serial sexual predator first began.
There will be more to say about this soon, and I will post updates here.
Update July 20, 2020: Rathjen resigns.
Peter Rathjen has resigned, supposedly due to "ill health," while still under investigation for serious misconduct. I won't comment on his health issues, other than to say that his abuse of women, over his entire career, caused ill mental health to many.
Here is Chancellor Catherine Branson's announcement to the university community. Some readers of this blog might have comments on how well Mike Brooks, who has been serving as acting Vice-Chancellor in Rathjen's absence, has upheld the university's purported principles of fair treatment of students and staff over his years as an administrator at the university.
Resignation of Vice-Chancellor Professor Peter Rathjen AO Dear Colleagues I am writing to inform you that the University’s Council has accepted the resignation of Vice-Chancellor Professor Peter Rathjen AO, due to ill health. The University extends its appreciation for the contribution Professor Rathjen has made since taking up the role in 2018. Professor Mike Brooks has been Acting Vice-Chancellor since Professor Rathjen was granted leave of absence in early May 2020, and I am grateful to Professor Brooks for the seamless continuity of leadership he is providing to our University community. The University will make an announcement about the search for a new Vice-Chancellor in due course. In the meantime, our focus will remain on the continued delivery of high-quality teaching, learning and research, supporting the State’s social and economic needs, and responding to the challenges faced by our community from the ongoing COVID-19 global pandemic. Kind regards Cathy -- The Hon. Catherine Branson AC QC Chancellor Office of the Chancellor and Council Secretariat The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005 Ph: +61 8313 5668 Fax: +61 8313 4407 Email: chancellor@adelaide.edu.au
ICAC investigations are normally top secret, with serious penalties for journalists or individuals who divulge confidential information. Although the inquiry has been widely reported in the Australian press, as far as I know only The Australian has provided a reason for it: That Rathjen had engaged in "a personal relationship with a staff member." (Depending on where you access this article, it may be behind a paywall.)
(Just 24 hours earlier, the university's Chancellor, Kevin Scarce, resigned his position. While the reasons are still unclear, there are no allegations of misconduct being reported as of yet.)
Although I have talked to sources at the university, I cannot claim to know more than that at the moment, as information concerning the matter has been closely guarded. I do, however, know something about Rathjen's long history of alleged misconduct, which includes chronic and widely known sexual harassment at the University of Adelaide during his earlier tenure there as a professor and department chair; a misconduct case at a major Australian university which found him guilty of sexual assault against a student; and, while Vice-Chancellor at the University of Tasmania, his alleged protection of the notorious pedophile Nicolaas Bester, who re-offended while a PhD student at UTAS.
Rathjen first came on my radar last year when I was reporting on the case of Alan Cooper, formerly chief of Adelaide's ancient DNA center, who has since been fired for misconduct. A number of women who had been at the university during Rathjen's earlier tenure there (1990-2006) approached me, concerned that Rathjen would be making the final decision about Cooper's fate. At that time, I was told by multiple sources, Rathjen had developed a well known reputation as a sexual harasser. The sources included individuals who had directly experienced this behavior.
The Alan Cooper case revealed that misconduct, including bullying and sexual harassment, had been tolerated at the University of Adelaide for many years. Thus, while complaints against Cooper were made to the university administration beginning in 2006, the first full year that he was in charge of the Australian Centre for Ancient DNA (ACAD), administrators ignored them until last year, when survivors of the abuse finally began to go public. Media coverage in the Australian press, along with major scientific journals such as Science and Nature, made it impossible for Adelaide officials to continue covering up for Cooper, despite the major prestige that ACAD had brought to the university.
(Cooper is currently appealing his firing, and a hearing on the matter is expected around July. University staff have been interviewing and re-interviewing many of the original complainants to get their case ready.)
Faye McCallum |
Bullying and nepotism in the School of Education, abuse of staff at the Adelaide Dental School.
Soon after I began reporting on Alan Cooper, sources within the university began to approach me with allegations of misconduct in other schools and departments. The first such case concerned the head of the School of Education, Faye McCallum. Again, multiple sources testified to an atmosphere of bullying and harassment in the school; in August 2018, the National Tertiary Education Union NTEU), which represents employees in Australian higher education, was forced to write to Jennie Shaw, executive dean in the faculty of arts, because no action against the numerous complaints of bullying, overwork, abuse, and questionable staff appointments had been taken despite numerous complaints. Unfortunately, on May 15, Shaw announced that McCallum had been given a two-year extension of her appointment as head of the School of Education. That fight goes on.
Meanwhile, very similar complaints have arisen in the world-class Adelaide Dental School, which over the last few years has seen its autonomy eroded by the edicts of university administrators. Earlier this year, NTEU conducted a confidential survey which included questions about health and safety, bullying, and confidence in senior school and faculty management. About 80% of staff gave negative responses, according to an April 6, 2020 letter from Cheryl Baldwin--division industrial organizer for the NTEU's South Australia division--to Benjamin Kile, executive dean of Adelaide's Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences. I have considerable documentation of the alleged abuses and will be reporting on them in more detail soon.
Grace Tame |
Peter Rathjen: Sexual assault, protecting a pedophile, ---?
As I mentioned above, during Rathjen's tenure at a major Australian university, he was found guilty of sexual assault against a student. As this is a very sensitive matter, kept strictly secret, I am not identifying the university in question to protect sources. I hope to be able to say more soon, but there is no doubt about the truth of the matter. Australian academic culture, like the academic culture of most countries, is rife with retaliation and threats of retaliation. The level of fear about speaking out is quite high, especially as Australian science is still largely ruled by an old boys' club in which women (and many men) are the subject of constant intimidation.
This brings us to the case of Nicolaas Bester, one of Australia's most notorious pedophiles. Bester was convicted of grooming and sexually assaulted a 15 year old girl, Grace Tame, while a teacher at St. Michael's Collegiate School in Hobart, Tasmania. In 2011, Bester was sentenced to two years and ten months in jail for his crimes. But due to archaic Tasmanian laws (also enforced in Australia's Northern Territory) that purport to protect victims but actually mask the identity of abusers, Tame had to wait nine years before she could speak out about what happened to her. With the help of journalist and anti-sexual assault advocate Nina Funnell, Tame scored a historic win in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, winning the right to identify herself and name her abuser.
(Funnell wrote a number of articles about the Bester case, including one in which Bester claimed to have been the real victim.)
Bester later entered a graduate program in chemistry at the University of Tasmania (UTAS.). And in 2016, while a PhD student there, Bester was sentenced again to four months in jail for remarks he made on social media about his abuse of Grace Tame, including calling his abuse of her "awesome" and "enviable." A judge ruled that this behavior amounted to the production of child exploitation material online, which seems a reasonable decision at the very least.
Enter Peter Rathjen again. After Bester served his new jail sentence, he returned to the University of Tasmania campus, where Rathjen was Vice-Chancellor, to continue his PhD work, unimpeded by any action from the university administration. That failure to protect students led, in spring of 2017, to a petition campaign calling upon the university to ban him. The campaign was led by the UTAS Women's Collective, and ultimately gathered more than 1600 signatures. "Myself and many others are incredibly disappointed with the University of Tasmania for not removing Nicolaas Bester from campus," said Heidi La Paglia, a member of the collective who started the petition.
The university refused to take any action. According to my sources, Rathjen was instrumental in the decision to allow Bester to finish his graduate work. But both he and Bester had their supporters. Chief among them was the well known Australian barrister Greg Barns, an advocate for prison reform and staunch defender of Julian Assange. In a Twitter exchange with me after he saw my social media posts on Rathjen and the Bester case--in which he accused me of engaging in a "sleazy trial by media campaign"--Barns praised the former UTAS Vice-Chancellor, saying that "Rathjen behaved impeccably and in accordance with the rule of law and fairness."
To sum up simply: It appears that Peter Rathjen has been involved in sexual misconduct, both as an abuser and an enabler, for most of his career. There may be some irony in the fact that his career will probably end in Adelaide, where his reputation as a serial sexual predator first began.
There will be more to say about this soon, and I will post updates here.
Update July 20, 2020: Rathjen resigns.
Peter Rathjen has resigned, supposedly due to "ill health," while still under investigation for serious misconduct. I won't comment on his health issues, other than to say that his abuse of women, over his entire career, caused ill mental health to many.
Here is Chancellor Catherine Branson's announcement to the university community. Some readers of this blog might have comments on how well Mike Brooks, who has been serving as acting Vice-Chancellor in Rathjen's absence, has upheld the university's purported principles of fair treatment of students and staff over his years as an administrator at the university.
Resignation of Vice-Chancellor Professor Peter Rathjen AO Dear Colleagues I am writing to inform you that the University’s Council has accepted the resignation of Vice-Chancellor Professor Peter Rathjen AO, due to ill health. The University extends its appreciation for the contribution Professor Rathjen has made since taking up the role in 2018. Professor Mike Brooks has been Acting Vice-Chancellor since Professor Rathjen was granted leave of absence in early May 2020, and I am grateful to Professor Brooks for the seamless continuity of leadership he is providing to our University community. The University will make an announcement about the search for a new Vice-Chancellor in due course. In the meantime, our focus will remain on the continued delivery of high-quality teaching, learning and research, supporting the State’s social and economic needs, and responding to the challenges faced by our community from the ongoing COVID-19 global pandemic. Kind regards Cathy -- The Hon. Catherine Branson AC QC Chancellor Office of the Chancellor and Council Secretariat The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005 Ph: +61 8313 5668 Fax: +61 8313 4407 Email: chancellor@adelaide.edu.au
234 Comments
"The Deputy Chancellor [Branson] also advised him that she wished to become Chancellor.
The Chancellor [Scarce] was given a fait accompli. If he did not resign he would be stood down. That would have been extraordinarily embarrassing for him."
Branson should resign. If Rathjen's payout is true, Mike Brooks should go immediately. He has handled many cases very poorly - see other comments in this blog. There should be a major shake up in the council. SHAME ON THE CURRENT LEADERS for failing the staff and students.
[Alluniversity] Update from the Chancellor – ICAC findings
Dear Colleagues,
The Independent Commissioner Against Corruption (ICAC) has today made a public statement relating to allegations of improper conduct by the University’s former Vice-Chancellor, Professor Peter Rathjen AO, and the University’s handling of those allegations.
The Commissioner has found that the former Vice-Chancellor, Professor Rathjen, was guilty of serious misconduct for the purposes of the ICAC Act. No finding of misconduct or maladministration was made by the Commissioner against any other person.
It is important for you to know that the University has fully cooperated with all aspects of the ICAC inquiry, which began when the former Chancellor, Rear Admiral the Hon. Kevin Scarce AC CSC, reported the matter directly to the Commissioner.
The University of Adelaide is pleased that the Commissioner’s statement has been released as it allows us to address the understandable concern from our community about the nature of the issues under investigation and to properly inform our own staff and the broader University community.
The conduct of the former Vice-Chancellor as outlined by the Commissioner is unacceptable and does not represent our values or expectations of behaviour at the University from any staff member, especially our most senior leader.
This behaviour shouldn’t be tolerated, whether in a University, another workplace, or any part of our community.
I am particularly distressed by and apologise for the impact that the former Vice-Chancellor’s behaviour has had on others. I acknowledge that it has reflected badly on the University.
The University regrets the initial handling of this incident, which followed external legal advice given to the University. While Professor Rathjen’s actions were his own, we acknowledge that the way in which the matter was initially dealt with by the University was not appropriate.
The University accepts and will adopt all of the recommendations made by ICAC to improve our processes. We are already applying what we have learned to ensure that the University becomes a stronger, safer and more respectful place to work and study.
I am committed to maintaining and strengthening a culture and environment which allows students and staff to thrive, an environment in which individuals feel respected, safe, valued and welcome – that is our obligation as education providers and as an employer.
The University Council has already resolved to commission an appropriately qualified and experienced person to conduct an independent review of our processes and our checks and balances, in relation to the accountability of our most senior leadership.
Our new Staff Values and Behaviour Framework has recently been embraced by a large senior leadership group and will be shared with all of our staff and titleholders. This framework helps to reinforce the values of our University and to ensure that those values are reflected in the behaviour of our staff.
As Chancellor, I’m confident we will become a better institution from this experience. I firmly believe that our values and culture must be led from the very top. I am committed to ensuring this happens.
Yours sincerely,
The Hon. Catherine Branson AC QC
Chancellor
--
The Hon.Catherine Branson AC QC
Chancellor
Office of the Chancellor and Council Secretariat
The University of Adelaide
Ph: +61 8313 5668
Fax: +61 8313 4407
Email: chancellor@adelaide.edu.au
THE STAFF KNOW YOUR OLD TRICKS. DO NOT TRY TO DECEIVE THEM AGAIN.
The university has used external organizations for culture check in the past but then made decisions that suited management anyway. The only exception is Alan Cooper's case because Nature conducted its own investigation and started publishing the data - thanks to Balter for breaking the news. The management can have all the independent data and still make a final decision that they have decided prior to the investigation. Regardless of all the serious bullying complaints made, they got away by saying, "There is no bullying problem". Investigations were made by Executive Dean, Deputy VCs ... all the way to VC (Rathjen and Brooks). They gaslighted the victims anyway.
How do you know the university will not do the same thing with "an independent review of our processes and our checks and balances"? Their track record does not instill any confidence in staff. It will just be waste of time and money. They waste money on futile exercises and keep cutting teaching budget so they can waste more money on other exercises.
How can you trust the same administrators who have failed staff time and again?
Is the university going to apologize to the bullied victims?? Many have retired, resigned or taken early package, and the problems went away for the management.
Do not get fooled by empty talks and hollow lies from higher management. Do not believe them until you see it in action.
Things will only change if there is serious punishment for administrators for failing the staff or the system. Punish HR for failing to record complaints, and to executive deans and higher up for failing to take actions on deans who are bullies.
The whole systems needs clean up.
Rathjen would have thought he was invincible. He failed to notice two things: the effectiveness of Balter's journalism and ICAC investigation. Those things changed the tide. Others who have behaved like Rathjen and have protected bullies should be concerned because you are not invincible. Otherwise you will be held accountable for the bullies' actions. Please do the right thing by people.
You cannot teach academic integrity to students if you are a pathological liar and a political animal. The current management has too many of those. You punish students for cheating in exams or plagiarizing in their assignments, yet you cheat and lie all the time. You are not being fair. Rathjen was not being fair.
These are some quotes from past US Presidents (they have gone through more than we have):
John Adams: "If conscience disapproves, the loudest applauses of the world are of little value."
George Washington: “It is better to offer no excuse than a bad one.” ...
“It is better to be alone than in bad company.” ...
“If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” ...
Franklin D Roosevelt: "Only a foolish optimist can deny the dark realities of the moment. Our greatest primary task is to put people to work. This is no unsolvable problem if we face it wisely and courageously."
DO NOT TOLERATE BULLYING AT UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE. REPORT IT TO ICAC AS A STARTER. IT IS MANDATORY REQUIREMENT. YOU CAN REPORT ANONYMOUSLY.
IF ANYONE RETALIATES, LET MICHAEL KNOW. LET US KNOW IN THIS BLOG. WE WILL PROTECT OUR RIGHTS FOR BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS.
We saw in the recent EAV process that lines of communication were deliberately and tightly controlled by management to push their preferred outcome. Management convened "staff forums" where questions had to be submitted in advance, and management moderated FAQ pages. Some staff reported having emails censored by management to avoid discussion. Twenty years ago, staff elected their Head of School. Now the Heads of School are rubber stamps for the higher management - look at their job descriptions, there is no doubt.
I would not be surprised if the VC selection committee has already made up their mind. The ICAC statement makes this hard and clear, "The Chancellor [Scarce] was given a fait accompli..." [by the then Deputy Chancellor, Branson].
A potential candidate could have already been given "fait accompli". The press suggested it was someone from Queensland who was coming back to Adelaide.
As the Anonymous from August 26, 2020 at 11:47 PM says, the whole leadership team should be ashamed and resign. Students have no respect for you. Students and recent graduates are now demanding that Rathjen's signature be replaced with someone credible on their parchments. This might happen with Branson too. The student body knows about the contents of this blog well now.
Now I hope that we can have some positive culture change at UofA. I think there is more change needed at the top before students and staff will trust again. Very upsetting. Thank you Mr Balter for your amazing work and dedication. There are so many more stories to tell....
https://au.gofundme.com/f/freedom-of-the-press-defense-fund-kurin-v-balter
$8,517 raised of $20,000 target
Balter has been doing great work for Adelaide and other universities for free. Now he needs our support to cover some legal fees to retain integrity in academia.
Who initiated the survey and why?, and who set the terms of reference?
Is there a reason that it is coming right at the tail end of the tenure of the current Commissioner Bruce Lander?
Is it also by chance that it comes precisely at a time when 'influencers', politicians and lobbyists are pushing for a university merger?
Rathjen clearly deserves every iota of public humiliation he has received from the Commission, and hopefully his victims feel vindicated.
But, let's all apply some critical thinking to whatever revelations come next. Who (if anyone) comes out of the survey fatally wounded, and who (if anyone) comes out of it pure and virtuous and able to save us all?
It is almost illegal to think about the operations of ICAC, let alone discuss its current investigations - and that is all the more reason to monitor the fairness and independence of its actions.
https://icac.sa.gov.au/report/public-integrity-survey-2018 and https://icac.sa.gov.au/report/in-their-own-words
The truth at last, or at least some of it, about Peter Rathjen, the U of Adelaide, the U of Melbourne, the U of Tasmania, etc. [Updated August 28, 2020]
http://michael-balter.blogspot.com/2020/08/the-truth-at-last-or-at-least-some-of.html
Please donate to Freedom of the Press Defense Fund Kurin v. Balter
https://au.gofundme.com/f/freedom-of-the-press-defense-fund-kurin-v-balter
Without Michael's relenting efforts, Alan Cooper and Peter Rathjen would still be misusing their power. Now he needs your support to held people accountable to their actions. We need him to keep integrity in academia.
I was particularly interested in the comment 'Lander did not have good things to say about the current Chancellor and her position must be in doubt. Staff just do not have confidence in the senior leadership of the University and the Council to appoint a new VC. The composition of these senior management appointment panels is totally inappropriate. No Executive Deans, Heads of Schools nor Senior Professors.'
If accurate, this indication of further power-shifting AWAY from Executive Deans and Heads of Schools to senior leaders such as VC, Pro-VCs, Convening Committees and the like, reflects the additional concentration of remote decision-making in the 20 years since I left. It’s now easier than ever to declare ‘confidential’ to hide behind the cloak of secrecy.
Despite my long absence from the University, I still received the Chancellor’s letter referred to in several posts above. As is typical, when referring to the lamentable Peter Rathjen, Ms. Branson relies on SIRs (Standardised Institutional Responses) by declaring '…is unacceptable and does not represent our values…', '…behaviour shouldn’t be tolerated…' and so on. However, the blame-shifting continues: 'The University regrets the initial handling of this incident, which followed external legal advice given to the University.' This easily translates as: It wasn’t our fault; those damn lawyers gave us a bum steer.
The departure of Rathjen is a good first step, but it shouldn’t also double as the last.
Have no doubts that if you are using a University issued laptop, logged into Uni email, or logging into a University Wi-Fi that they may be following your activities online and collating log-on times with comments. I'm stating the obvious here, but Universities and their management cannot be trusted, they have excellent IT resources and bucketloads of taxpayers cash to throw at using any means (including criminal means) to protect their "reputation".
At the very least get yourself a good non-logging VPN like Mullvad ($7 month no contract) and a free Protonmail or Tutanota email account with a strong password. Drop Google Chrome and use 'Duck Duck Go' through Firefox as a search engine for any searches that could link you to snooping!
You can go further and use the Tor browser for anonymity (without the need for a VPN). It restricts/hinders access to some sites but allows you to access Protonmail and Tutanota email and also to publish anonymous and free blogs on Wordpress.com to get your story out there if you have one to tell.
I applaud Michael for hosting and updating this blog but can not understand how the Universities haven't yet managed to take it down. Monash University (another Go8) was quick to take down blogs by Professor Qizhi Chen who was sacked after she made allegations of sexual harassment, corruption and cover ups. Monash literally spent millions fighting that one.
Good to see the blog is regularly being saved to Wayback as a precaution.
In the US, at least, it is next to impossible to take down a blog or engage in any kind of prior restraint of freedom of expression. We do not have the kind of draconian defamation laws that Australia is suffering under, fortunately.
And ironically, the Litigation Hold Order in the Kurin v. Balter $10 million defamation suit against me forbids any deletion of material on this blog, so no one can take it down as that has the force of a court order!
Finally, please take this discussion over to the latest blog post about Rathjen, where much of it is continuing unabated.
1. Why does the uni management need someone, a third party to look into this matter? Is the uni management useless f**k heads.
2. Why ICAC not taking any action against the management who could not do their own job? In that case I am totally eligible for VC role.
3. Why is everyone not giving out the names of the culprits? you are anonymous on the blog or use a home laptop or use you phone. (It’s smarter than you are that’s why we call it hem smart phones). Please write down you experience and the name dickheads (don’t Think of me as sexist but both male and female bosses can be cause of problems at work place). At least you will be helping others.
4. How come no body from other departments speaking out??? Come on people.
5. The whole idea of open discussion is not just to blame the culprit whose crime are out there, but to encourage people to talk and learn from others experience.
https://michael-balter.blogspot.com/2020/08/the-truth-at-last-or-at-least-some-of.html
Anonymous said…
"University councils have no role in operations, so they only know what they're told by the VC. Elected academic and student representatives have long been disenfranchised by corporatisation and rumour of any wrongdoing is all they can go by unless someone comes forward officialy. Those "electeds" would normally feel vulnerable in our now fully corporatised system. It takes someone like a Drew Pavlou (most courageous young person in Australia IMHO) at U. Queensland, willing to risk everything, to bring serious issues and behaviour to light. The level of institutional harassment Pavlou has experienced is worthy of a "Balter-esque" investigation - student raises issue of UQ allowing and complying with foreign government influence, VC getting $ reward from said foreign government, foreign diplomat made Adjunct Prof, diplomat inciting violence against student, said diplomat being investigated by Queensland police for same, law suits both ways.....stay tuned."
And now said former UQ VC at the centre of the above controversy has now been appointed as the new Vice Chancellor at U Adelaide - despite one of the "deepest background checks ever competed for an in-coming VC" - Chancellor Catherine Branson. HOW CAN THAT BE SO Chancellor Branson? U Adelaide just simply cannot steer itself away from controversy, or, seriously tainted so-called leaders.